ROI on RFID may be longer than expected
Staff -- Purchasing, 12/9/2004 2:00:00 AM
Two new research reports concluded that the return-on-investment for RFID may be longer than some users and early adopters may be prepared to wait. A new study by the ARC Advisory Group found that 95% of companies surveyed expect the return-on-investment for RFID to be more than two years and that "more efficient warehouse receiving and better management of inbound materials may have to wait until companies have been able to negotiate with their upstream suppliers to engage in more RFID tagging."
ARC interviewed 24 companies actively investing in electronic product code RFID and respondents found that even at 20ยข a tag, a company that ships 50 million cases a year will incur a $10 million cost. And it's likely to incur, says ARC, another $1 million in expenses to prepare the RFID infrastructure. Furthermore, it increases the labor aspect of warehouse processes, adding perhaps another $500,000 in new operating costs.
ARC identified three major hurdles to achieving ROI in RFID: the reliability of reads needs to improve greatly, a significant drop in the cost of tags and a critical mass of retailers with RFID mandates. Regardless, ARC found that companies are continuing to invest in RFID, in part because of mandates from companies like Wal-Mart that says that by January its top 100 suppliers must apply passive RFID tags to cases and pallets headed toward three specific distribution centers.
Another recent study by ABI Research offer much the same conclusion.
"While firms such as Gillette, International Paper, Kimberly-Clark, and Campbell Soup demonstrate the possibility of making RFID work, other companies are still looking for answers," says ABI. "Many logistics and IT management staffs still struggle to integrate RFID hardware and software into enterprise systems for quantifiable long term benefits, without major disruption."
WMS market mature, but growing
06/14/2007RFID News
01/12/2005Consolidation looms in WMS market
06/17/2009RFID News
08/31/2005

























