Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Zibb
Subscribe to Purchasing
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

'It's your problem, not ours.'

Ultra Electronics asked contract manufacturer to share in replacement costs

By Staff -- Purchasing, 6/14/2007



Ultra Electronics Ocean Systems delivered a finished assembly to a customer on-time and on-budget, but the product failed the customer's tests. The customer requested repair or replacement at Ultra's cost, which the company agreed to. The recovery cost, less the repair or replacement cost, was approximately $60,000. Ultra's own failure analysis pointed to a major component as the culprit. Ultra had supplied the component to its contract manufacturer, who integrated it with other components from other sources.

Problem: Ultra Purchasing Manager Dick Adams and his team had to determine who was ultimately responsible for the problem: Ultra, because it supplied the component to the contract manufacturer; the supplier who provided the component to Ultra; or the contract manufacturer. Testing revealed there was a latent defect in the component, one that would not normally be discovered in routine testing. The supplier said it wasn't responsible for problems that occur after its component is integrated into assemblies.

Solution:

Here is what Ultra Purchasing Manager Dick Adams and his team did:

Adams arranged for the technical staff at Ultra to do further tests on the part. What they discovered was that there was a “latent” defect in the part. It was “latent” in the sense that it would not normally be detected during standard testing. Adams pointed out that the suppliers terms and conditions didn’t cover such “latent” defects.

Ultra had a longstanding relationship with the supplier, whose quality generally had been outstanding. That plus the fact that the supplier had used tests Ultra specified led Adams to believe that Ultra should bear some of the burden of the cost—but not all the cost. Nevertheless, he asked the supplier to reimburse Ultra for the $60,000 recovery cost. The supplier countered with an offer to pick up $20,000 of the cost, saying it had delivered a functional product that had passed Ultra’s tests. Adams insisted that the “latent” defect should have been corrected by the supplier.

Result: The supplier agreed to reimburse Ultra $30,000, half the recovery cost.

Are you a black belt negotiator?
Tell us about one of your negotiation successes, and we'll print it so others can learn from your experience. Send it to pteague@reedbusiness.com.

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links

 
Advertisement
Sponsored Links

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Purchlive

Blogs

  • Richard G. Weissman
    Back to School

    December 1, 2008
    Supplier Relationships: Now More Than Ever
    The "bunker mentality" that seems to be permeating business these days will destroy most of the supply management gains made in the past ......
    More
  • View All BlogsRSS
Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

Resource Center E-Alert (Monthly)
Price + Supply Alert (Weekly)
Monday Midday Business Report (Weekly)
Electronics Distribution and Global Sourcing (Monthly)
IdeaFile (Twice Monthly)
Supplier Web Locator (4x/year)
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
© 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites