Bad descriptions. Bad decisions. High costs.
The world of MRO is replete with holes, errors and uncontrolled costs (not just price). One example is the condition of product descriptions. It is rare that a company’s SKU (stock keeping unit) listing has complete descriptions; most are missing one or more important attributes. In an effort to reduce cost, the purchasing group will put together a Request for Quote (RFQ) for commodities. With inadequate descriptions, the company is open to price responses that can cause dangerous situations.For example, an RFQ on fuses has the brand and the amps; the volts and part numbers are missing. The supplier will quote the price of the fuse with the lowest volts because it is the cheapest. If the supplier is awarded the business and then told the fuses are wrong (i.e., the higher voltage is required), the price goes up. It is now too late to switch suppliers.
The same thing occurs when a brand is not specified. The lowest price is quoted only to find out that only Buss, e.g., is acceptable. Again, it is too late to change.
Many RFQs do not include quantities or consistent units of measure. A supplier can quote an assumption of order quantity and then raise the price when the order quantities are small or broken package. When the unit of measure for ordering is different than the unit of issue, the quantities on the RFQ can be misleading and cause inconsistent price quotes.
The effect of inadequate information is a potentially costly, and perhaps dangerous, situation where savings are lost and/or inadequate parts are used.
Tommy commented:
Good point, do the right things first time when add/extend material code at ERP system for muliti-location company.
Titan Engineering commented:
Valid points, buyers must know that they need to send RFQ with complete details to get good quotes. Just shooting RFQ without full details, even in some cases without buyer info will only delay the time cycle of procurement.
www.titanengg.com.sg
Dick E commented:
The issue surrounds the lack of a robust enough process that standardizes ALL locations and establishes a naming format. Each location did their own thing for years and centralizing is a daunting task. The other aspect is that it takes time and resources to fix and for years the "lean" aspect has meant people instead of the process. To fix takes dedicated folks and time to capture the savings. The Financila guru's still see MRO and that "other" area that may not be all the important. It will take a mind set change to reverse.
Bob commented:
All very good points - and made consistently over many years. Why do purchasing groups still rely on this process when it is so obviously inadequate?

















